人民日报论政：法律不缺席，闹婚不闹心
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with allowed-questions
Search options not deleted
user 11689
百度 研讨会上，各位专家、教授和学者根据古代地理名著《山海经》《水经注》和当前学术研究成果，论证了廆山、平逢山文化遗址存于孙旗屯乡辖区境内。
Questions about the acceptability of questions. This tag denotes discussions about what is acceptable to post on the site, and for what reasons in either direction. When using this tag, please be as specific about your question(s) as you can be, to improve the quality and applicability of answers.
12
votes
How do we feel towards specific questions about the history of a certain game mechanic?
As the person who posted the example question, it shouldn't be a surprise that I'm more in favor of including this as a permissible question type. Questions of history, trivia, and the like strike me …
- 5,977